Re: Call for testers: FPU changes

On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> 
> Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too.
> f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock
> engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure.

I did some more tests since someone said they had problems with geli,
ipsec and padlock. In the simple tests I did, I didnt find any
regressions or speed differences.  Info appended to

http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html

I also compared to stock RELENG_8 and padlock and didnt find any issues.

	---Mike

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"