Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incide

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote:
>
> > (and is GPL btw)
>
> Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has
> proper crypto signing using GPG:
>
>
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F
>
>
>

http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING
"
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
  <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l2>Version 2, June
1991

 <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l3>
"

In their repository , it is GPL v2 .

Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ?

Thank you very much .

Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"