Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incide

看板FB_security作者時間12年前 (2013/04/27 12:34), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串18/21 (看更多)
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:10 AM, C. P. Ghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com> > wrote: > > 19.11.2012 14:34, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> > >> On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote: > >> > >>> (and is GPL btw) > >> > >> > >> Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has > >> proper crypto signing using GPG: > >> > >> > >> > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F > > > > > > :%s/BSD/LGP/ > > > > http://mercurial.selenic.com/about/ > > Even if it was BSD licensed, Mercurial has a huge dependency: > Python; and Git is Perl-based. So neither of them is ideal, IMHO. > If at all, we'd need a lean and mean distributed SCM program > like Mercurial or Git, but written in C that we could add to base. > Any volunteers? > > -cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/License http://selenic.com/hg/file/tip/COPYING http://mercurial.selenic.com/about/ "Mercurial is free software licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public License Version 2 <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.txt> or any later version." No one of them above mentions "BSD license" , or "dual license" , etc. Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Similar projects _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrLAFP (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 18 之 21 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrLAFP (FB_security)