Re: logging _rtld errors
--2lcUOdKuHx/sbuIt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:54:46AM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote:
> > Are there any security reasons as to why
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D142258 =9A([patch] rtld(1)=
: add
> > ability to log or print rtld errors)
> >
> > would not have been committed to the tree ?
>=20
> I've added kib@ to Cc list.
>=20
> It doesn't seem to me that this proposed change would do something
> with security? Personally I think the change is reasonable (but we
> may want printf be replaced with _rtld_error in rtld.c and use
> LD_UTRACE there?)
I also think that UTRACE part is not bad, but will object against the
LD_PRINT_ERROR part. FWIW, it should use rtld_printf() instead of printf(),
but this is moot point.
--2lcUOdKuHx/sbuIt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAk7vl/8ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4isYgCbBQXBybwMYLZTabB9zUzSK0w5
sWEAoLKyXt3sw4hLuj6NFBWuNqAg41PM
=d15s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2lcUOdKuHx/sbuIt--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇)：