Re: Which AES to use?

看板FB_security作者時間14年前 (2011/09/26 15:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
I don't know cryptopgraphics very well but the data throughput would be a little better with lower keysize. However with a powerful CPU (maybe AES-NI instructions included) this wouldn't matter anymore. As compromise you could choose AES-192 if you need it more secure than 128 bit. Finally quoted from Bruce Schneiers Blog: "And for new applications I suggest that people don't use AES-256. AES-128 provides more than enough security margin for the forseeable future. But if you're already using AES-256, there's no reason to change." Best regards Robert Am 25.09.2011 23:17, schrieb Robert Simmons: > I've been reading on Bruce Schneier's blog about key diffusion and the > key schedule in AES 256 being poor. Including this, for use in a geli > encrypted provider, what are the pros and cons of selecting AES 128, > 192, or 256? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EW2foYt (FB_security)
文章代碼(AID): #1EW2foYt (FB_security)