Malloc -Z

看板FB_security作者時間14年前 (2011/07/27 20:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/9 (看更多)
Was reading malloc(3) while chasing corruption suspects. Does the presence of -Z imply that without it, programs can be allocated dirty (non-zeroed) memory? If so, it seems running with -Z would be prudent if one cares. Therefore, what is the rough percent performance impact of -Z compared to default malloc? Bonus: What would be needed to make the useful streams: /dev/one /dev/10 /dev/01 In addition to /dev/zero. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EC0L3k6 (FB_security)
文章代碼(AID): #1EC0L3k6 (FB_security)