Re: OpenSSL CVE-2009-4355

On 1/20/2010 2:56 PM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:

>    Per Daniele Sluijters's inquiry on the 15th,CVE-2009-4355, as
>    well as with a provision/draft fix for CVE-2009-3555
>    MITM/Renegotiation Venerability.

All:

  Did anyone ever come to a finding on CVE-2009-4355?

  Using the comments in Redhat Bugzilla, I was never able
  to re-create it on RELENG_6_3.

  Of course, RELENG_6_3, RELENG_7_2, and RELENG_8 are still
  behind OpenSSL 0.9.8m.  FreeBSD9-Current seems to have 1.x-latest

  - NetBSD fixed it in 5.0.2:
    http://cvsweb.de.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/crypto
           /dist/openssl/crypto/comp/Attic/c_zlib.c
  - RHEL/Fedora patched their OpenSSL RPMs months ago.

  Without widespread working DoS code in the wild, are we happy
  instead, with patches to userland/ports etc.?  Apache
  httpd 2.2.15 and php5.3.2 in Ports?

Thanks,

  ~BAS

>    I suspect we wont have a patch out for RELENG_6_3 by the 31st?
>    But I'm willing to maintain one for another few months.
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: OpenSSL<openssl@openssl.org>
> Reply-to: openssl-users@openssl.org
> To: openssl-users@openssl.org, openssl-announce@openssl.org
> Subject: OpenSSL 1.0.0 beta5 release
> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:19:16 +0100
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"