Re: PHK's MD5 might not be slow enough anymore

看板FB_security作者時間16年前 (2010/02/02 04:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串31/35 (看更多)
On 02/01/10 10:24, Matthew Dillon wrote: > If you don't need PAM's extra features for your sshd access (which is > most people) then turn PAM off in your sshd_config to work around the > base code change that DES made. Then the other options will work as > intended. And, just to be safe, also turn off the challenge-response > option. > > UsePAM no > ChallengeResponseAuthentication no > PasswordAuthentication no I agree that turning PAM off whenever possible is a good thing. It should also be noted that regardless of what appears in the default config file those options should be uncommented so that you can be sure they will be effective across updates. For the old-school paranoids (like me) the following options are also of interest "just in case": RhostsRSAAuthentication no HostbasedAuthentication no IgnoreRhosts yes hth, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ Computers are useless. They can only give you answers. -- Pablo Picasso _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1BPpf3zX (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1BPpf3zX (FB_security)