Re: PAM rules inside pam.d
Thanks for your valuable inputs. The PAM module information is not yet clea=
r
for me. The pam_unix, which i debugged was from Linux-PAM-0.78 (www.*linux*
fromscratch.org/blfs/view/blfs-book-6.0-html/postlfs/*linux*_*pam*.html )
I think the libraries too belong to the same library. I apologize=EF=BF=BD =
if i
asked this query to wrong forum.
Currently i dont see any issues with crypt library as you have suggested. I
will plan to upgrade the PAM library and see how it goes.
Thanks a lot
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote=
:
> Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> writes:
> > I debugged pam_unix aswell, it looks like crypt function is giving
> > different strings for telnet and my application with same passwd
> > string and salt. So i think the issue could be with crypt library
> > linked telnet and my application.
> > please let me know your thoughts
>
> There's not much I can say (or think) since you still haven't told me
> what you upgraded *from* and *to*, but I doubt very much that there is
> anything wrong with crypt(). The only two possibilities I can think of
> are a) your application calls set_crypt_format() with an incorrect
> argument, or b) your application contains an alternate (incorrect)
> implementation of crypt(), or is linked to a library that does.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 6 篇):