Re: OpenBSM questions

On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Garrett Wollman wrote:

> <<On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:45:14 +0100 (BST), Robert Watson 
> <rwatson@freebsd.org> said:
>
>> This is correct -- login services must be modified to properly set up user 
>> audit state at login.  I am not familiar with work relating to this with 
>> xdm, kdm, gdm, etc, but it would be very good to see this happen.
>
> Surely this is something that belongs in a PAM module...?  The whole point 
> of the PAM framework is that you should *not* have to modify every program 
> that does a login when new mechanisms are introduced or policy changes.

Setting login state is not the only thing that audit does.  Audit requirements 
also exist to audit failures in the login process that may be entirely 
unrelated to authentication.

That said, I'm not 100% sure that the audit state, leaving aside the auditing 
of login events, couldn't be done in a PAM module.  An interesting question is 
why the rest of the UNIX credential is also not set up using PAM -- see calls 
to setlogin(2), setusercontext(3), etc, in login.c and other things involved 
in login.

Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"