Re: nx-bit and TPM

Quoting Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> (from Thu, 29 Mar 2007 =20
23:36:24 +0200):

> Igor <runixd@gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm was looking through handbook and wikipedia and it appears FreeBSD
>> doesn't support hardware (nor software) nx bit.
>> There also doesn't seem to be any support for TPM (Trusted Platform Modul=
e).
>
> I believe NX support was never implemented because Intel's version of
> AMD64 didn't support it.  As for TPM, I don't see the point.

This should not stop us in using it on amd64 if available. I think one =20
of the problem was/is the lack of time/man-power. So if someone comes =20
up with a good (enough) implementation which works on our supported =20
hardware, I don't think it will be rejected.

Regarding TPM: there are good an bad uses for it. As our policy is to =20
provide possibilities and not to force policies on our users, I don't =20
see a reason why we will not incorporate good code regarding this. I =20
also think that we don't have it, as nobody needed it or wasn't =20
allowed to contribute code.

But all this is better suited for arch@ I think (or maybe amd64@ in =20
case of NX).

Bye,
Alexander.

--=20
"If a camel flies, no one laughs if it doesn't get very far."
=09=09-- Paul White

http://www.Leidinger.net    Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org       netchild @ FreeBSD.org  : PGP ID =3D 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"