Re: Is it feasible to cross-build compat5x binary?

看板FB_security作者時間20年前 (2005/10/27 01:30), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/14 (看更多)
In message: <20051025170934.GA29561@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes: : On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:47:57AM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: : > Hi Peter and others, : > : > > At some stage, we need to validate our cross-build chain with cmp(1). : > > We can probably leverage off the work that NetBSD has done in this : > > area. This would significantly simplify the work involved in supporting : > > the various architectures. : > : > in case you know enough about NetBSD's build.sh, can you say if FreeBSD's : > build architecture is powerful enough to merely use it with a few s/// : > or does it still lack one or more things ? : : I expect it's pretty different. ru@ did a lot of work on : cross-building FreeBSD though, and he had a fairly detailed list : of known differences between cross-built and native builds. I'm not : sure if he reduced it to 0 length. NetBSD build.sh runs great on FreeBSD, when building NetBSD sources that is :-). I know that cross builds for i386 from amd64 work well enough. However, we[*] was unable to get a full cross build for i386 world seutp on my amd64 machine when last I tried. Warner [*] tried to setup a dual amd64 box as our build server for our embedded FreeBSD/i386 product. It was quite a bit more complicated than just a normal cross build, but there were many issues that our (both FreeBSD and our company's) build system paper over for a few edge cases that seem to not matter... _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #13Nxqs00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #13Nxqs00 (FB_security)