Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c

看板FB_security作者時間20年前 (2005/07/06 11:58), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/13 (看更多)
In some mail from Richard Coleman, sie said: > 1. I thought that T/TCP was being removed from FreeBSD (already happened?). > 2. It's trivial to predict Theo's response to this. > 3. Since T/TCP is rare, there is little motivation to alter scrub to > function differently than OpenBSD with respect to these packets. If > someone really needs this, there are plenty of alternatives. I didn't know about (1) but I'd agree with (2) and (3). > But more importantly, the original question has been lost. The original > question was what should the various firewalls do when the kernel has > been compiled with TCP_DROP_SYNFIN. Regardless of whether those packets > are valid or not, a person may have reason to compile this feature into > the kernel. So, should the firewalls acts differently if this kernel > option is used? IMHO, No. Darren _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #12orRD00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #12orRD00 (FB_security)