Re: packets with syn/fin vs pf_norm.c

看板FB_security作者時間20年前 (2005/07/04 08:54), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/13 (看更多)
Jesper Wallin <jesper@hackunite.net> writes: > First of all, I know that not dropping SYN/FIN isn't really a big deal, it > just makes no sense. But since it doesn't make any sense, I don't see > the reason why not to discard them. It is not invalid for a TCP segment to have both SYN and FIN set. See for instance RFC 1644. > I'm running pf on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p3 and I scrub any traffic. I've > read some other posts on google and as far as I can tell, clearly invalid > packets (like packets with SYN/RST set) is discared while scrub simply > remove the FIN bit on packets with SYN/FIN. It shouldn't, at least not unconditionally. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #12o8ZO00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #12o8ZO00 (FB_security)