Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules

看板FB_security作者時間21年前 (2004/11/21 20:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/10 (看更多)
In message <20041120210256.K27307@zoraida.natserv.net>, Francisco Reyes writes: >On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> If the list is long it may be almost as good, if not better, to use >> blackhole routes for it. > >I was not familiar with the term. Looking in Google came up with a link. >However in that link they recommend against that method. > >http://tinyurl.com/5r5cl > >Also any link on how to implement it? route add -host $IP 127.0.0.1 -blackhole >What would be the advantage of that route vs ipfw? It's faster because the route table uses a tree for lookup whereas the firewall is sequential. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #11e8hN00 (FB_security)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #11e8hN00 (FB_security)