Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
--Apple-Mail=_4B12DBBC-CA02-4A2A-B034-04B4192E48D3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
On Jul 20, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Daniel Feenberg <feenberg@nber.org> wrote:
> Rather they have said "An updated pf would not be
> suitable, as it would be incompatible with existing configuration =
files".
A major FreeBSD version increment is allowed to break that level of =
backwards compatibility. Nothing prevents this from being incorporated =
into 11.x.
The only real concern would be removing existing core functionality as =
part of the update. For that you want to provide at least one major =
release cycle for people up migrate. Comparing pf on my current OpenBSD =
machines vs. the FreeBSD 10.x pf, that doesn't seem to be an issue.
--lyndon
--Apple-Mail=_4B12DBBC-CA02-4A2A-B034-04B4192E48D3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Wq6E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Apple-Mail=_4B12DBBC-CA02-4A2A-B034-04B4192E48D3--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 38 之 44 篇)：