Re: Future of pf / firewall in FreeBSD ? - does it have one ?
--AMNVzrRY61gDOMe/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:18:54PM +0100, krad wrote:
> all of that is true, but you are missing the point. Having two versions of
> pf on the bsd's at the user level, is a bad thing. It confuses people,
> which puts them off. Its a classic case of divide an conquer for other
> platforms. I really like the idea of the openpf version, that has been
> mentioned in this thread. It would be awesome if it ended up as a supported
> linux thing as well, so the world could be rid of iptables. However i guess
> thats just an unrealistic dream
And you don't seem to get the point that _someone_ has to do the work.
No one has stepped up so far, so nothing is going to change.
--AMNVzrRY61gDOMe/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)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=
=xaNd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--AMNVzrRY61gDOMe/--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 32 之 44 篇)：