Re: [SOLVED] Bacula 5.2.12_5 Port update issues
--bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 04:00:32PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>=20
> On Jul 4, 2014, at 3:42 AM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote:
>=20
> > On 07/03/14 15:51, dweimer wrote:
> >> I am trying to update my Bacula server to the latest Bacula port updat=
e,
> >> 5.2.12_5, however It's failing to compile. Has anyone else trying this
> >> update, ran into an issue?
> >=20
> > Yes, on a 8.4/amd64 system, with only Postgres as enabled option.
> >=20
> > Deleting the port and reinstalling didn't help; strangely neither did a=
svn downgrade up to one year ago.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > Turns out that libbac.la comes from bacula-client, but bacula-client pk=
g-list is in bacula-server port, where libbac.la was removed from pkg-plist=
=2Eclient in rev 360216.
> >=20
> > So my solution was to:
> > _ downgrade bacula-server to rev 359586;
> > _ reinstall bacula-client;
> > _ reinstall bacula-server.
> >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > On the long run maybe lib/libbac.la should be readded to pkg-plist.clie=
nt?
> > Since I don't know the rationale behind this change, I don't know if th=
is is the correct solution, so I won't post a PR with a patch.
> >=20
>=20
> Baptiste: are you available to make this change to the pkg-plist.client f=
ile please?
>=20
> This relates to the 'Stage bacula=E2=80=99 commit on 2 July.
>=20
> =E2=80=94=20
> Dan Langille
>=20
hum I do not understand the issue la files are removed on purpose, can I ha=
ve
the log of the build failure?
regards,
Bapt
--bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlO3ECAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwTOACgvc0NxYMwXl+CfVvRpVVQnMKs
rOoAn07+a0xfqqsgQanmEAQPnnSUJwc1
=l/sE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bFUYW7mPOLJ+Jd2A--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇)：