Re: 9.0 install and journaling

看板FB_questions作者時間14年前 (2011/12/14 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串21/25 (看更多)
--On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 09:54:38 AM +1000 Da Rock=20 <freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote: >>> As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their = biggest >>> failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem >>> with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with >>> filling up usr, etc. And root always stays protected! Its saved my life >>> a number of times... I can quickly fill TB's of data in no time, and if >>> something goes bang the logs can be a silent killer too. My 2c's >>> anyway... _______________________________________________ >>> >> And along those lines for security of the system, this is the U.S. DoD >> recommendations (well mandates really) including ZFS. Not that the DoD >> doesn=E2=80=99t have security problems... but I=E2=80=99m not big fan of = the one or >> two mount point solution either=E2=80=A6 never understood why other OS >> packagers think is okay to just dump it all under / >> >> Per the DISA STIG (Security Technical Implementation Guide) >> >> / (obviously) >> /<home directories)> >> /var >> /tmp >> /<location of audit files> >> >> should all be separate mount points "The use of separate file systems = for >> different paths can protect the system from failures resulting from a >> file system becoming full or failing"... >> >> in addition... >> >> All local file systems must employ journaling or another mechanism that >> ensures file system consistency. >> >> Removable media, remote file systems, and any file system that does not >> contain approved device files must be mounted with the "nodev" option. >> >> Removable media, remote file systems, and any file system that does not >> contain approved setuid files must be mounted with the "nosuid" option. >> >> The nosuid option must be enabled on all NFS client mounts. >> >> and so on... you can find a copy of the UNIX STIG online and some of it >> is just crazy paranoia and makes your life a pain, but there are a lot = of >> good practices in it too. >> >> > I don't think any of it crazy paranoia. A PITA, maybe, but not paranoid. > > Do you have a link to the original of it? Sure, <http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/> Lots more there than just UNIX too. I find that the newer "SRG" xml files=20 are easier to just load into a browsers and read the recommendations rather = than pouring through the big sections in the STIGs. <http://iase.disa.mil/stigs/downloads/zip/unclassified_os-srg-unix_v1r1_fin= alsrg.zip> Or just do the checklists. There are no *BSD specific ones but the the=20 generic UNIX STIG works good (probably because at this point *BSD is=20 basically the reference implementation of UNIX or at least it should be...=20 damn Linux) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EvvBgJo (FB_questions)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EvvBgJo (FB_questions)