Re: which ports require dialog during update

看板FB_questions作者時間14年前 (2011/10/23 18:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串10/14 (看更多)
from Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>: > I like to have all config dialogs done and out of the way. > You might want to consider using portmaster, which handles that (and a > bunch of other stuff) for you. I think portmaster has an equivalent for 'portupgrade -R' to portupgrade dependencies? I think one would use 'portupgrade -r' less frequently. I like to save a build log, would the config-recursive part be disrupted or disruptive? NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that they have a good idea in this aspect. Tom _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1Ee-NXpY (FB_questions)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Ee-NXpY (FB_questions)