Re: Fwd: Interrupt Overload

看板FB_hackers作者時間11年前 (2014/06/08 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/9 (看更多)
On 06/07/2014 12:04 PM, Vladislav Prodan wrote: > > > > --- Original message --- > From: "Dutch Ingraham" <stoa@gmx.us> > Date: 7 June 2014, 18:33:12 > > >> >> Thanks for the response. >> >> The output you requested: >> >> kern.eventtimer.choice: HPET1 (440) HPET2 (440) HPET3 (440) HPET4 (440) >> HPET5 (440) HPET6 (440) LAPIC (400) i8254 (100) RTC (0) >> >> kern.eventtimer.choice: HPET (did not specify 1, 2, etc.) >> >> I also changed the type of timer to LAPIC and rebooted; there was no >> appreciable change in the interrupt activity. > > After reboot what became timer? :) > > You can change the timer "on the fly", without rebooting the system. > > If LAPIC does not help, then try other timers. > > > -- > Vladislav V. Prodan > System & Network Administrator > support.od.ua > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You're right, it is not persistent. I changed to each different event timer and the only one that made a difference was the i8254; that dropped the cpu load from 30% to 10-12%. Much better, but still of course not acceptable for a Core II-Duo running at 3.0GHz. The load averages shown in <top> do also drop proportionally. Interestingly, though, <systat -vmstat> shows the same interrupt rate - 325K/sec. What do you make of the fact that when I suspend with <<acpiconf -s 3> and then wake-up, everything is absolutely normal, regardless of event timer type? _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1JarDVKo (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1JarDVKo (FB_hackers)