Re: Can fmake be deleted?

看板FB_hackers作者時間11年前 (2014/04/23 06:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/12 (看更多)
--jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:37:14PM -0700, Julio Merino wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wr= ote: > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:20:46PM -0700, Julio Merino wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> The WITHOUT_BMAKE=3Dyes build has been broken for over a month and, as > >> far as I can tell, only tinderbox noticed... (Should be fixed with a > >> commit I made yesterday but tinderbox hasn't caught up yet.) > >> > >> Question: is there any reason to keep the old fmake around or could it > >> be deleted along all the MK_BMAKE logic? > >> > > At least for the ports side the plan is to drop fmake support as soon as > > possible. >=20 > What does that mean? >=20 > - Can ports drop support for fmake before fmake is removed from base? That is the plan, as long as all supported version of FreeBSD has bmake installed. We haven't got through the details yet :) >=20 > - Can fmake be removed from base even if ports hasn't yet dropped its > support for fmake? Yes as right now we do support both >=20 > Thanks Bapt --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlNW4yIACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzeRgCdFohQh3joiP61jvwmXCPI2bbE 7PcAoI4ML8VitU83qfw2JfgwiBkbH6vC =dSps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw--
文章代碼(AID): #1JLkQUEV (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1JLkQUEV (FB_hackers)