Re: Stuck CLOSED sockets / sshd / zombies...

On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Konstantin Belousov wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:23:00PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>> The correct solution is to merge libthr into libc. Some neccessary
>>> preparations were already done, but the main work did not started yet.
>>> This is huge efforts, and it probably should be coordinated with some
>>> other ABI changes planed for libthr to support process-shared locks.
>>
>> Eek, no, I don't think that is necessary.  When we go to using real
>> structs instead of pointers for synchronization types (mutex, CV)
>> in libthr, then I don't think there will be a problem.
>
> Could you, please, clarify what do you consider not neccessary ?
> The merge, the (unrelated) ABI change, or coordination ?

Sorry, I should have elided parts of the email to which I
was not responding.  I mean merging libthr into libc.  I
think we should wait until we change mutex, CV, and perhaps
pthread to be structs, then see if merging libthr into
libc is still necessary.

-- 
DE
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"