Re: Problems with rpc.statd and PAE
Jo緌 Carlos Mendes Lu疄 wrote:
> Don Lewis wrote:
> > I've been seeing this same problem for a long time on an 7.0-CURRENT
> > i386 machine with 1GB of RAM, and I'm not using PAE. I haven't
> > discovered any obvious cause for the problem.
>
> It's a production file server, so I cannot make any test today, but this
> weekend I'll try to recompile statd to use less memory.
>
> Is there a good reason to map 256M at once?
Is there a good reason _not_ to do it?
rpc.statd has always mapped 256M, for as long as FreeBSD
exists (maybe longer). I've never had a proble with that.
Obviously it does that because it makes managing the state
data easier. That's enough of a good reason, I think.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Gesch輎tsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M榀-
chen, HRB 125758, Gesch輎tsf梶rer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"File names are infinite in length, where infinity is set to 255 characters."
-- Peter Collinson, "The Unix File System"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 5 篇):