Re: Problems with rpc.statd and PAE

看板FB_hackers作者時間18年前 (2007/08/13 14:38), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/5 (看更多)
Jo緌 Carlos Mendes Lu疄 wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: > > I've been seeing this same problem for a long time on an 7.0-CURRENT > > i386 machine with 1GB of RAM, and I'm not using PAE. I haven't > > discovered any obvious cause for the problem. > > It's a production file server, so I cannot make any test today, but this > weekend I'll try to recompile statd to use less memory. > > Is there a good reason to map 256M at once? Is there a good reason _not_ to do it? rpc.statd has always mapped 256M, for as long as FreeBSD exists (maybe longer). I've never had a proble with that. Obviously it does that because it makes managing the state data easier. That's enough of a good reason, I think. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Gesch輎tsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht M榀- chen, HRB 125758, Gesch輎tsf梶rer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd "File names are infinite in length, where infinity is set to 255 characters." -- Peter Collinson, "The Unix File System" _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #16l_nl00 (FB_hackers)
文章代碼(AID): #16l_nl00 (FB_hackers)