Re: i386 with PAE or AMD64 on PowerEdge with 4G RAM

看板FB_hackers作者時間18年前 (2007/06/19 07:39), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/21 (看更多)
--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:10:22PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:15:30PM -0400, Martin Turgeon wrote: > > My setup is fairly standard (as I described), should I expect problem = with > > 64 bit version of these programs? >=20 > Like I said, I don't run 64-bit OSes because I prefer compatibility. > Believe me, the instant you run into some quirky problem with either the > kernel or any of its subsystems, or a third-party program (from ports or > otherwise), the first thing you'll be told is "it works for me on i386, > have you tried i386?" I think this assertion is false. amd64 is pretty well supported and run by an increasing number of users and developers. Kris --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdxeSWry0BWjoQKURAuPaAJ4i3CHo8B+/VqQp6QcknYwDvZME+wCghpWJ 9fJHKwGaNxPp/Ax33no/Eq4= =Nc/2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--
文章代碼(AID): #16TnUw00 (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #16TnUw00 (FB_hackers)