Re: Making sense of ktrace(1) output

看板FB_hackers作者時間18年前 (2007/06/19 03:26), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/8 (看更多)
--XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2007-Jun-18 15:37:11 +0200, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> wrote: >well.. instead of using ktrace I'd suggest building profiled pkg_add >and see that way where the time is spent. ktrace is great if you dont >have the source code... but you do :) If you decide to go this route, you might like to apply http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D99800 By default gmon.out is overwritten by each process so you will only get the output from the last process of a given name. My patch optionally saves the profiling output each process in a separate file. gprof(1) can already accumulate the output from multiple files so this patch gives you the ability to profile multiple executions of a single executable. You will still need to glue together the profiling results from each executable. --=20 Peter Jeremy --XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGdtn5/opHv/APuIcRAmkyAKCboAL6jB2sRTjQluQcvc+tPlpSOACfbzet gJzXr6ckSL6Mk/PdT9nopf4= =AIBr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x--
文章代碼(AID): #16Tjnl00 (FB_hackers)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #16Tjnl00 (FB_hackers)