Re: [PATCH] docproj port needs to use tidy-devel

On Thu, January 17, 2008 6:24 am, Murray Stokely wrote:
> Is there any reason not to update the docproj port to use tidy-devel
> rather
> than tidy?  The released version of tidy is nearly 8 years old and
> produces
> xhtml that doesn't validate.  The newer -devel releases produce more
> correct
> xhtml.
>      - Murray
>
>

I think the problem at some point was that tidy-devel was a 'quick' moving
target which got updated often and is missing a few things that we would
like to have included in the tidy we use (Certain flags, but I cannot
recall which of them exactly), I recall speaking with Hiroki about this
(if I remember this correctly; it was more then 1.5years ago at least :-))

Note that I would also like to see that we use tidy-devel instead of
tidy... :-)

Cheers
remko

-- 
/"\   Best regards,                      | remko@FreeBSD.org
\ /   Remko Lodder                       | remko@EFnet
 X    http://www.evilcoder.org/          |
/ \   ASCII Ribbon Campaign              | Against HTML Mail and News

_______________________________________________
freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"