Re: Code policy on doc/ tree?
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__6_00_58_55_2006_909)--
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote
in <a78074950601280909o489a0f7bn35ca3368052b6111@mail.gmail.com>:
de> In order to be able to generate usable PDF and RTF files for the
de> FreeBSD Simplified Chinese Project, we have added several building
de> hooks into our local tree, which is available at:
de>
de> http://cvsweb.freebsd.org.cn/doc/zh_CN.GB2312/share/mk/Attic/?only_with_tag=CNPROJ
de>
de> Is code allowed here? Should we make it as a port?
Hmm, I think making a port is better for now because it depends
on Jade and JadeTeX. Also, I have some comments:
- cjktexsty.lex:
I think this has duplicated functionality of ucharacters.sty in JadeTeX,
and almost all of them can be done in TeX level, too. What is wrong to make
this as Chinese version of JadeTeX? I am interested in if there are any
specific reasons to make it as an additional binary.
- fixrtf.lex
I think it is good to make this as a port and jade depend on it.
--
| Hiroki SATO
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__6_00_58_55_2006_909)--
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBD5iC/TyzT2CeTzy0RArHDAKCVqrsDaIYU0Cse7baUzhvEeVtVcACgjnhv
4GJjGxeJGOKGHlNSA1s8YJU=
=IJyz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
----Security_Multipart(Mon_Feb__6_00_58_55_2006_909)----
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 6 篇)：