Re: cvs commit: ports/accessibility/jovie Makefile

On 2012/02/17 15:10, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote on 17.02.2012 18:00:
>> On 2012/02/17 14:39, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> (from Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:34:32
>>> +0100):
>>>
>>>> On 2012/02/17 03:22, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Also, is there an effective and foolproof method to calculating all
>>>>> the
>>>>> LIB_DEPENDS? (Remembering that some of the LIB_DEPENDS may depend on
>>>>> optional settings, and these all need to be considered?)
>>>>
>>>> Only sure way to find out would be to run ldd on every binary in every
>>>> package.
>>>
>>> /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/explicit_lib_depends.sh looks which libs are
>>> recorded as directly required for each binary in an installed port and
>>> calculates a LIB_DEPENDS based upon this.
>>>
>>> When I wanted to change the LIB_DEPENDS to match the output, I was told,
>>> that the LIB_DEPENDS wass correct, and the it is a bug (in libtool,
>>> pkg-config and similar ways of obtaining the libs) that additional libs
>>> are recorded there.
>>
>> Yes but that's a somewhat different problem. I'd be happy with
>> identifying all direct _and_ indirect binaries and bumping their ports,
>> for now. Still better than relying on Makefile/INDEX metadata..
>
> Dunno, if it's correct, but I'm using beta.freshports.org interface to
> grab depended port's list. F.e. http://beta.freshports.org/devel/pcre:
> lists all the ports in "Required by: " field. They are splitted by "for
> Build", "for Libraries" and "for Run".

That's just what is in INDEX...

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
               <pav@FreeBSD.org>
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"