Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/lcms2 Makefile

看板FB_cvs作者時間14年前 (2011/11/04 16:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/6 (看更多)
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:20:27AM -0700, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > On Fri, 4 Nov 2011 03:41:21 +0000 (UTC) > Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> mentioned: > > - Use more standard MANPREFIX instead of MAN1PREFIX which also does not > > seem to be documented anywhere > > It is actually documented in bsd.port.mk, and I don't see a reason to Hmm, you're right, it is mentioned in bpm, but I find it a bit hard to understand: # MANPREFIX - The directory prefix for ${MAN<sect>} and ${MLINKS}. # Default: ${PREFIX} # MAN<sect>PREFIX # - If manual pages of some sections install in different # locations than others, use these. # Default: ${MANPREFIX} In particular, I don't quite get this "some sections install in different locations than others" part. Why so complicated? What exactly does it suppose to mean? > change it to MANPREFIX, as MAN1PREFIX has more semantical information > in it and correct here, since the manpages installed are meant for the > section 1 of the manual. So how come if it is correct for section N of the manual to use MAN<N>PREFIX is it only used in bsd.perl.mk? Frankly speaking I've never seen this variable until today, which means vast majority of ports do not use it... >From that description in bmp, it kinda seems MAN<N>PREFIX should be used in some special occasions (unless I'm utterly wrong and miss some important point). For normal cases, more opaque MANPREFIX should be used, and I don't see how this port is not normal. I'm all eager to be educated further, please pardon my ignorance. ../danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1Eivk_mR (FB_cvs)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Eivk_mR (FB_cvs)