Re: libdevattr

On 7/15/14, Bruno Lauz=E9 <brunolauze@msn.com> wrote:
> I was looking at dragonfly and why they have libdevattr and we don'tI rea=
lly
> think having udev compatible api would open the door to a lot of software,
> imho.I feel it wouldn't be so complicated to port dragonfly kern_udev,
> libprop and libdevattr from dragonfly bsd.
> Am i missing a point or is this in contradiction witch any of freebsd
> objectives?
> Let me know your thoughts... 		 	   		=

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

In FreeBSD exists similar utility like udev, the so called devd. In
github is there a project, which would improve the compatibility or
completely change the udev like brain-damage.
https://github.com/freebsd/libdevq
Other problem with udev is, that moving so fast, and every time
changed their API, and udev's future are not clear, possibly merged
with systemd.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"