performance of ipfw and pf in CURRENT?
--Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A while ago some performance graphs were floating around here showing the n=
et
performance of ipfw and pf. pf was, as far as I can remember, the single th=
readed
version. Are there more recent performance benchmarks available? Even if pf=
in FreeBSD is
still behind pf in recent OpenBSD, FreeBSD has now an threaded adaption and=
it would be
nice to see the overall performance for both.
Thanks,
oh
--Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTaQ05AAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8cH0H/iUIzYK/XUrf0HzyAfcPew/L
LMXU6qsnMq+WnPxLN2vCCiJGpCJeGe/YZYLGD6YVm+pAynYvthA4mvFNXqWxghik
ZPivCg+lZOnC/TIXoKFjdv0G/rQxr1ZBLW9ax4dLmi0kZ5UQGHOsiYheVSs2Bvhy
xQytWIU5syl75ptKld7TTysl99xucJGRnhZ2M6XtogGyD7ARCJN45HrLER0C+8JM
KwTWc8Re0dp3qhFd4RfUJmE+TARuBlWBHu44fdZvM7y8iTdfqx5w+yM62Kh3ViLh
spSNSK5RWqodduOU+lQh2Zj+wFdMuRA9a9L1hNq4L0+EAxOZWR0iusEP61lbdw8=
=G4wj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/XYKSfFgdQGL0cv2AOyC5sT4--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 3 篇)：