Re: POLA.. missing --sysroot option in ld?

看板FB_current作者時間11年前 (2014/05/02 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串4/6 (看更多)
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:02:31PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Apr 29, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >=20 > > On 4/30/14, 10:36 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> In our 8.0 based systems at $JOB our build environment made heavy use = of the --sysroot option in gcc and ld. > >>=20 > >> We are trying to move up to a newer release but suddenly the --sysroot= option has disappeared. > >>=20 > >> we get the message "/usr/bin/ld: this linker was not configured to use= sysroots" > > more spefically the following command (from 'configure') fails on "near= 9" > > and succeeds on 8.0. > >=20 > > configure:3352: /usr/bin/gcc -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -nostdinc -is= ystem /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/include --sysroot /usr/bu= ild/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4 -Wall -Wno-unused-parame > > ter -nostdinc -isystem /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/inc= lude --sysroot /usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4 --sysroot /usr/buil= d/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4 -L/usr/build/buildroot/too > > ls/x86_gcc4.2.4/lib -L/usr/build/buildroot/tools/x86_gcc4.2.4/usr/lib c= onftest.c >&5 > >>=20 > >> Does anyone know what happened? and when, and by who? > >> I have looked in the Makefiles and configuration files in SVN and I ca= n't see a change that would have done this.. > >> of course the building of these tools is rather complex so I may have = missed some place.. >=20 > Yea, I looked too and don?t see anything. I thought it was broken in more= like 2005 not 2011. You?re only hope is to bisect the tree down to the cha= nge that caused it? It's been broken since at least the last binutils import and probably longer since the inane ld behavior of activating --sysroot only when built with a specified sysroot is from upstream. The fix is trivial, just merge r257268 and r257530 to the branch you are using. -- Brooks --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iKYEARECAGYFAlNiSaZfFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDY1NUQ1MTlDMjZBNzgyRTcyNTI5OUJGMDVE OEU4QkU5RjIzODFBRDQACgkQXY6L6fI4GtSUuwCfQ2Nz6YJ4HgYusrNSoArrpSK8 LEIAn2Bd8gDAxqU2qHYWT8VTLXOh3kcX =t2pm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
文章代碼(AID): #1JOelVwA (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1JOelVwA (FB_current)