RE: libinit idea

It's really good to read the comments and see people point of view on this =
topic.=A0
I totally agree RC system is really good and stable, easy and extensible.
The main concern I have here is performance. Starting a system is really sl=
ow.
Boot to X (with simple xdm) is minimum 25 secs and I just feel there's some=
thing to do to cut this delay.

----------------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:33:30 -0800
> From: list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com
> To: fjwcash@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: libinit idea
> CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
>
> On 2/23/2014 10:31 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
>> The main developer for systemd is very anti-portability and anti-!Linux.=
 He
>> had actively rejected patches that made his projects work on non-Linux
>> systems. In order to port systemd to a non-Linux system, he wants you to
>> first implement every Linux feature that systemd uses.
>>
>> systemd is a non-starter, and not with considering.
>
> It's pretty clear Lennart Poettering failed history.
>
> Perhaps the best examples of why systemd is an anti-pattern is this:
> systemd stores logs in a binary journal. After the Linux zealots have
> spent about two decades using binary system data storage as one of the
> reasons Windows sucks, that strikes me as particularly ironic.
>
> The RC system we have is proof you do not need anything more than bourne
> and a respectable amount of intelligence to design a good init system.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org=
" 		 	   		  =

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"