Re: SVN commit 259045 breaks -CURRENT
--BFvPoRvBsltj3jVY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Marc UBM wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:43:22 +0200
> Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 09:56:04PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:47:22AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 02:16:27PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:11:15PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > > > > > Am 14.12.2013 22:59, schrieb Steve Kargl:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 10:44:10PM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> 2) SSH logins are very slow, many seconds of delay between c=
onnect
> > > > > > >> and password prompt, several seconds after password entry=
until
> > > > > > >> a command prompt appears (normally instantaneous)
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >=20
> > > > > > > Ah, so that explains the behavior I'm see. Just updated a ci=
rca Aug 3rd
> > > > > > > i386 FreeBSD to top-of-tree. My ssh logins to my work system=
take 30+
> > > > > > > seconds now. :(
> > > > > >=20
> > > > > > You may want to test the attached patch, which reverts the above
> > > > > > mentioned commit.
> > > > > >=20
> > > > >=20
> > > > > I probably won't get to it until tomorrow, because I had started
> > > > > a dog-food system purge including re-installing all ports. The
> > > > > laptop takes a bit a time to recompile everything.
> > > > >=20
> > > >=20
> > > > Are you all running i386, compiled with gcc ?
> > >=20
> > > The Aug 3rd system was built with gcc. The system upgrade I
> > > did this morning is using clang. I rebuilt everything and
> > > delete old things with delete-old and delete-old-libs.
>=20
> A kernel built with the commit reverted has not exhibited any similar
> behavior during the whole day. I'll recompile again with the overflow
> option enabled to see if the issue returns.
I am interested in a different experiment. Compile the same version
of the kernel with gcc with -fno-strict-overflow enabled. Report if
the same problem persist.
I am going to revert the option in several minutes, but do want see
the result of the above test.
--BFvPoRvBsltj3jVY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD)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=1yjU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--BFvPoRvBsltj3jVY--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 15 之 15 篇)：