Re: libc++ vs. libstdc++ usage in the ports tree

On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:49:19 +0100 Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 12/13/2013 14:47, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:12:04 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> I see the octave port is still broken.
>>>
>>> After a clean install on my self, removing all installed ports, 
>>> reverting my local chnages in /usr/pors, and rebuilding all ports,
>>> I'm see the original problem.
>>>
>>> % octave
>>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>>
>>> PLEASE, commit your patch ASAP.
>> 
>> Committed in r336344.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Is it exactly the same as you attached here:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-December/046986.html
> 
> Or should I rebuild on my machines?

If you applied the patch to a subversion checkout you may get a conflict
on Mk/Uses/fortran.mk and math/octave/Makefile when updating which you
can resolve using the 'tf' option (theirs-full).  Besides that the
patches are functionally the same so you don't have to rebuild anything.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"