Re: Request for testing an alternate branch

On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:

> Also, I'm still not a fan of the EAGAIN approach.  I'd rather have a method
> in bus_if.m to suspend or resume a single device and to track that a device
> is suspended or resumed via a device_t flag or some such. (I think I had
> suggested this previously as it would also allow us to have a tool to
> suspend/resume individual drivers at runtime apart from a full suspend/resume
> request).

Anything that made it easier to test suspend/resume
would be a huge bonus.

Tim

_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"