Re: Port problems after r253839 on HEAD

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/08/08 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/7 (看更多)
--0FM4RQAc0jwHekq5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:28:41PM +0200, Rainer Hurling wrote: > After introducing r253839 on HEAD (/head/contrib/binutils/ld/ldmain.c), > I recognized some wired behaviour in the ports system on my CURRENT boxes. >=20 > Some of the ports do not build anymore. They print almost similar > messages about an ld problem (invalid DSO for symbol 'xxx' definition), > followed by the lib, which symbols are not found. >=20 > With a recent 10.0-CURRENT (at least r253839) you can try this for > example with the following two ports: >=20 normally I had tracked down all those ports, except if you are building them with nom default options, What that means is basically the said ports are missing some -lbla in ldfla= gs, The missing ones are those listed in the line following the DSO bla in nano for example the first failure means -liconv is missing. I afk until 24th so I can't commit any fix to the said ports. There were properly building in my exp-run for the said change, meaning eit= her you build with non default options im that case the port requires a fix or perhaps your ports tree is not uptodate, in particular lots of those failur= es are fixed by the recent glib update. regards, Bapt --0FM4RQAc0jwHekq5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlICh0UACgkQ8kTtMUmk6ExG+wCfYtF24PkJc0JJ0gyd9ZE0O9uH TocAoMJo8ds2QNGJG0ik+x5p51/VSxg/ =Jck6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0FM4RQAc0jwHekq5--
文章代碼(AID): #1I0ejVc8 (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1I0ejVc8 (FB_current)