Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++:

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/07/13 21:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串21/26 (看更多)
On 13.7.2013 13:12, David Chisnall wrote: > On 12 Jul 2013, at 22:47, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > >> Obviously not really fixed, but even worse: >> >> if I use in C code (C99, using clang 3.3 on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 >> revision 253287) isnan(x) where x is a "const double", I receive now >> the following error (which doesn't appear on previous versions): > > Thanks. This is now fixed, however the _Generic() usage that we had there is also present in tgmath.h, and so this file will also need to be fixed in the same way. > > I've now tested the macros with clang/c99, clang/c11, clang/c++98 and clang/c++11, and gcc/c89 and they all seem to work for unqualified, const, volatile, and const-volatile qualified types. > > I've added Ed to the cc: list, as he wrote this code in tgmath.h. > > David > Instead of listing all possible type qualifier combinations (like in r253319), how about using a comma operator to strip away type qualifiers? Since only the result type of the expression matters and it isn't evaluated at all. like: #define __fp_type_select(x, f, d, ld) _Generic((0,(x)), Pasi _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1HuLRIqS (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 21 之 26 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1HuLRIqS (FB_current)