Re: control of order of inet devices

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/04/27 14:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串7/13 (看更多)
--NzX0AQGjRQPusK/O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:03:14PM -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:08:00AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Since people keep asking about this; maybe it's time we added a hint > > > to the bus code that allows for the unit to be set based on the pci > > > bus / slot / etc. > > > > I don't see how that would address Willy's request. Neither the unit > > number or the if_index of an interface effects its order in > > getifaddrs() output. > > > > With modern bus hierarchies, you probably don't want to use the unit > > anyway as it loses too much information. Some along the lines of > > Fedora's Consistent Network Device Naming would likely be more useful. > > That would be fairly easy to implement. > > > > -- Brooks > > >=20 >=20 > Fedora is using eth0 , ... , eth9 , but FreeBSD is using em* , re* , .. > names which is much better than Fedora ( or similar distributions ) > approach . As of Fedora 16 the default was changed: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/System_Administrators_Gu= ide/appe-Consistent_Network_Device_Naming.html -- Brooks --NzX0AQGjRQPusK/O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFRbaE5XY6L6fI4GtQRAibVAJdYxjwSha0r7Iwb/y3DVD40VCN1AKCd94Gs NRQ0i9nK9GPVz6PAQoAwEw== =e7T4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzX0AQGjRQPusK/O--
文章代碼(AID): #1HUscheH (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1HUscheH (FB_current)