Re: ZFS/RAIDZ and SAMBA: abyssimal performance

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/04/27 13:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串16/16 (看更多)
On Jan 4, 2013, at 4:06 PM, Fleuriot Damien <ml@my.gd> wrote: > > And network cards: > # Up a bit our intel cards parameters > hw.em.txd=4096 > hw.em.rxd=4096 > hw.em.tx_int_delay=512 > hw.em.rx_int_delay=512 > hw.em.tx_abs_int_delay=1024 > hw.em.rx_abs_int_delay=1024 > I am curious why we need to manually set up these values. Especially the txd/rxd -- here are few controllers supported by the em driver that can't handle 4096 descriptors and the choice could really be made at driver attach time.. That could also permit different em interfaces in the system (using different chips) to have different settings. My belief is the auto tuning should set things up for maximum performance, given the hardware and if someone really needs smaller queues they could just use the tunables. Are there drawbacks? Daniel _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrkq_u (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrkq_u (FB_current)