FORTRAN vs. Fortran (was: November 5th is Clang-Day)

看板FB_current作者時間12年前 (2013/04/27 12:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串9/10 (看更多)
--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 2 November 2012 at 12:21:03 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 21:59:17 -0700 > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> BTW, the name of the language is "Fortran". It's been "Fortran" >> for the last 30-something years. > > I never realised the name change. It seems that I am not alone with > this. Nor I. Looking at the Wikipedia page, I discover that it had been spelt "Fortran" as early as 1956, and there's even a copy of the 1956 Fortran manual online: http://www.fortran.com/FortranForTheIBM704.pdf Interesting reading. Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft MUA reports problems, please read http://tinyurl.com/broken-mua --/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlCTY1IACgkQIubykFB6QiMkSACdHTE7hecIW0x89HRAyQ0gmJ7s l/EAn36gwhQq0kH1/TkXxz9yffkqZAEi =L5vc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO--
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrJtQE (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1HUrJtQE (FB_current)