Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with

Thanks for replies.

"* Finally, default values for many things on 64-bit machines 
have been adjusted upward significantly to make proper use 
of available resources"

Well that one should be fast to test, if it really makes so much
difference. 

"* Scheduler rewrite"

They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's 
too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in
FreeBSD after all this time.

etc.

I would like to see some independent benchmarks and not
only Postgres too.

If they are really onto something, that's good and I'm happy
for them, as they were supposedly performance oriented 
projected, but it haven't show up in past benches.

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Re-new-DragonFly-3-2-scheduler-and-PostgreSQL-comparision-with-FreeBSD-9-1-RC1-tp5751589p5751862.html
Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"