Re: Latest -CURRENT/i386 could not start under VirutalBox 4.1.18

On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:57:30 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Ian Lepore
> <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> Yes, exactly.  I updated the PR to request that my patch not get
>> committed because it locks up virtualbox.  I hope to find time soon to
>> learn enough about installing/configuring virtualbox to figure out what
>> the problem is (offhand,I suspect it hangs in the loop that probes for
>> the need to re-index, because vbox doesn't quite emulate the hardware
>> behavior fully).
>
>      Why not just detect VBox and disable that functionality? VMware at
> least has a sane way of determining whether or not you're running it
> based on the SMBios ident..

VMware (as well as KVM and Xen) provides reliable way to detect its 
presence by checking "hypervisor present" CPUID's bit or accessing its 
I/O port, while VirtualBox doesn't do that, and matching SMBios ident 
doesn't seem to be really useful. Are there better and reliable ways of 
detecting VirtualBox?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"