Re: Compiler performance tests on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/09/16 13:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串22/24 (看更多)
--fze0sZZmuBV4A+b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 12:34:45AM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > By request, I performed a series of kernel performance tests on FreeBSD > 10.0-CURRENT, particularly comparing the runtime performance of GENERIC > kernels compiled by gcc 4.2.1 and by clang 3.2. >=20 > The attached text file[1] contains more information about the tests, > some semi-cooked performance data, and my conclusions. Any errors and > omissions are also my fault, so if you notice them, please let me know. >=20 > The executive summary: GENERIC kernels compiled with clang 3.2 are > slightly faster than those compiled by gcc 4.2.1, though the difference > will not very noticeable in practice. >=20 > Last but not least, thanks to Gavin Atkinson for providing the required > hardware. Thank you very much for doing this. I tried to map the CPUID into more human-friendly family moniker, and it seems that these are Pentium-4 class CPUs. Am I right ? If yes, could you, please, rerun the tests on anything more recent than Core2, i.e. any Core i7-whatever class of Xeons ? Thank again. --fze0sZZmuBV4A+b2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlBVYU0ACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4jwPACgprGQgUxqIAh8z5ymqizGgesx VhYAmwdDn4Pzlz28GNHUq4s4o6kl5s/q =aK0L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fze0sZZmuBV4A+b2--
文章代碼(AID): #1GLMHIhB (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GLMHIhB (FB_current)