Re: Time to bump default VM_SWZONE_SIZE_MAX?

John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> writes:
> Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes:
> > The limit we had was insufficient for 8 GB of swap.
> In absolute or practical terms?

This whole thing started because I have a machine with 8 GB swap that
ran out of swzone.

> At this point i386 is going to be used on smaller systems
> (e.g. netbooks, etc.), not servers that have lots of swap.

I don't think it's unreasonable for an i386 box to be maxed out on RAM
(4 GB) and have twice that amount of swap.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"