Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:47:26AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 August 2012 at 01:33, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:25:15AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> > > On 24 Aug 2012, at 23:38, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org (mailto:doug=
b@FreeBSD.org)> wrote:
> > > > Let me rephrase that more simply ... very few users are ever going =
to
> > > > need the bootstrapping tool that will be in the base.
> > >=20
> >=20
> >=20
> > So, then they won't use it. I fail to see the problem here.
>=20
> I also fail to see the problem. :) Just to be clear, my post was
> arguing against Doug's assertion that few will use pkg's bootstrapper
> (and that this is a problem): I hope that pkgng and package sets
> will vastly increase the use of binary packages by FreeBSD consumers.
> =20
I was avoiding writing two separate emails about this thread - yes, I
did realize we had a similar point of view on this. Sorry if it came
out differently.
> > /usr/sbin/pkg installs /usr/local/sbin/pkg without requiring the Ports
> > Collection to be available locally.
>=20
> Which is exactly the behaviour that I want: I view the ports tree
> as a last resort to be used only if binary packages fail to fulfil
> my needs. Sometimes I don't even bother fetching it. Once again,
> we may be in violent agreement here. :)
>=20
Understood. I misinterpreted your last sentence.
What I would like to know, is why all the anti-progress emails[1] have
to wait until the Last Minute(tm) when information on pkgng availability
has been available for quite some time now.
Welcome to 2012.
[1] - Doing the same things we've done keeps us in the same place we've
been.
Glen
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQOCPGAAoJEFJPDDeguUajGhoIALYeuhge8MCmhZ2KwhNBxwvi
sNBcE25EtIPkNTe/ikUZ5gRa1tp1LeLXCiPO/yetbsXNlq22m1VmxA/L/vg+Wp2B
lku5V97gHSyiJseZdFZx0ZK2EKglM7NbIrLOOKBPK9AtqSqF5Bp+Dpp6niElET+S
6KuEBOuigDKybiDMu8is8/SLiJe9aa0Sf3GPvSDVWcXKoXtE3gnQ6Y4JxsOfA6tn
8oI4GteORJFTrj8zPP6ArifnoWZ9e9bgIrwjdbzkkHotjAykk7e53R+Qu3tD7l7D
HGzl/sHFDGBPaI6ewIEuyDVB7svbtETbZSsoxRrPUZ6P+iE03HsR2NU9pcHYgn8=
=013n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 26 之 74 篇)：