Re: pkgng suggestion: renaming /usr/sbin/pkg to
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:25:15AM +0100, Jonathan Anderson wrote:
> On 24 Aug 2012, at 23:38, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > Let me rephrase that more simply ... very few users are ever going to
> > need the bootstrapping tool that will be in the base.
>=20
So, then they won't use it. I fail to see the problem here.
> But surely the whole point of pkgng is that people *will* use pkg
> as the default method of acquiring third-party software, so they'll
> want to "pkg install foo" and have it Just Work. To say either "you
> must download the ports tree in order to use binary packages" or
> "you must use pkg_add to install pkg" seems to miss the point...
>=20
/usr/sbin/pkg installs /usr/local/sbin/pkg without requiring the Ports
Collection to be available locally.
Glen
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQOB1qAAoJEFJPDDeguUajsFEH/j8vvdEx/IVKukZ5/SX/CKTS
ZXUvrGdtktWztHSSHicXdKp2Id0JErXv+BikdOftRst4FP2PPZd/N+1UNrlJ42sb
4rSrYxkKVf0ooQTwrfVlETfb5bAdtXZLNUCiNu/WFh/jbCpOgkkuwFr49HUhZCHg
4VL1/wsgYaVkcVNIDscIsKYRNImHosLem4kxKiht60P8SUsOQ07cWFU7olo/QEHw
E/b5gW/4TUnWsJpxZH0Xheh5mxw7eJ6l8XbKemdZmtYdq01VrygOI1WR7UgtxYf0
+64ZMf0Zv45opV8Ov7+ArHn0NVBTGe0tUas5cmwvUnsMe2b4xVpoX+VH6JRSBUA=
=2fL9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 24 之 74 篇)：