Re: r239356: does it mean,

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/08/22 11:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串26/28 (看更多)
On Aug 21, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hello, Lev. >>>> You wrote 21 =C1=D7=C7=D5=D3=D4=C1 2012 =C7., 15:40:35: >>>>=20 >>>> GC>> Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ = know. >>>> LS> I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment = alone), >>>> LS> that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with = "synchronous >>>> LS> dhcp" option in rc.conf). >>>> LS> Am I right? >>>> Also, I don't like idea of removing IP address from interface = when >>>> cable is unplugged. It was very disturbing behavior of Windows >>>> machines for years. I've unplug cable to change switch port for = only a >>>> second and all connections are broken, even if one second later >>>> dhcpclient receive SAME lease! I don't like this. FreeBSD was very >>>> tolerant to unplugging cable for eons, and I (and not only me) like >>>> it. If I understand this change properly, it is no more the case :( >>>=20 >>> Not only cable. >>> Turn on microwave, lost WiFi connection and lost all open ssh >>> session (and other network connection). >>=20 >> mosh helps. >=20 > No. Not all remote host allow to install mosh. > Cisco routers, for example, don't allow to install mosh. Yes. Mosh helps. You can mosh to a different host, then do what you = need to do to get to the cisco. Does mosh solve the problem in all cases, no. It just helps. Warner= _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1GD5Ao0z (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1GD5Ao0z (FB_current)