Re: r239356: does it mean, that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet

看板FB_current作者時間13年前 (2012/08/22 06:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串12/18 (看更多)
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 01:56:11PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Aug 21, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 03:45:48PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > > >> Hello, Lev. > >> You wrote 21 避ベ衲선2012 윮, 15:40:35: > >> > >> GC>> Try reverting r239356 -- if that works, then please let jhb@ know. > >> LS> I'm confused by this commit, because it seems (from comment alone), > >> LS> that dhclient will not work without devd anymore (with "synchronous > >> LS> dhcp" option in rc.conf). > >> LS> Am I right? > >> Also, I don't like idea of removing IP address from interface when > >> cable is unplugged. It was very disturbing behavior of Windows > >> machines for years. I've unplug cable to change switch port for only a > >> second and all connections are broken, even if one second later > >> dhcpclient receive SAME lease! I don't like this. FreeBSD was very > >> tolerant to unplugging cable for eons, and I (and not only me) like > >> it. If I understand this change properly, it is no more the case :( > > > > Not only cable. > > Turn on microwave, lost WiFi connection and lost all open ssh > > session (and other network connection). > > mosh helps. No. Not all remote host allow to install mosh. Cisco routers, for example, don't allow to install mosh. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1GD0nZfE (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 12 之 18 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1GD0nZfE (FB_current)